Hi Rainer,
On 1/18/24 10:13, Rainer Orth wrote:
Arthur Cohen <arthur.co...@embecosm.com> writes:
Using %lu to format size_t values breaks 32 bit targets, and %zu is not
supported by one of the hosts GCC aims to support - HPUX
But we do have uses of %zu in gcc/rust already!
diff --git a/gcc/rust/expand/rust-proc-macro.cc
b/gcc/rust/expand/rust-proc-macro.cc
index e8618485b71..09680733e98 100644
--- a/gcc/rust/expand/rust-proc-macro.cc
+++ b/gcc/rust/expand/rust-proc-macro.cc
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ load_macros (std::string path)
if (array == nullptr)
return {};
- rust_debug ("Found %lu procedural macros", array->length);
+ rust_debug ("Found %lu procedural macros", (unsigned long) array->length);
Not the best way either: array->length is std::uint64_t, so the format
should use
... %" PRIu64 " procedural...
instead.
I've attached my patch to PR rust/113461.
Yes, I was talking about this on IRC the other day - if we do run in a
situation where we have more than UINT32_MAX procedural macros in memory
we have big issues. These debug prints will probably end up getting
removed soon as they clutter the output a lot for little information.
I don't mind doing it the right way for our regular prints, but we have
not been using PRIu64 in our codebase so far, so I'd rather change all
those incriminating format specifiers at once later down the line - this
patch was pushed so that 32bit targets could bootstrap the Rust frontend
for now.
Best,
Arthur
Rainer
