Hi Jakub, Thanks for this, as I mentioned in my response to David we have made a table and use this link to try and see what's going on https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/20220824115956.737931-9-philip.her...@embecosm.com/T/#rbff0bb3df2780fecd9ee3d2baa864d9140d24b54
Do you think I should send a PING email to each patch which we are waiting on review for? Thanks --Phil On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 at 14:04, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 08:42:58AM -0400, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-10-04 at 13:29 +0100, Philip Herron wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > As the cut-off for merging is coming up in November, quite a few of > > > our patches have not been reviewed yet. > > > > > > There are a few main issues that have been raised so far, and we are > > > fixing those at the moment in preparation for version 3 of the > > > patches. Is there anything else we can do to make reviewing the rest > > > of the patches easier? > > > > Do you have a list of which patches need reviewing? > > e.g. perhaps a page showing: > > - which patches are waiting for a reviewer, as opposed to > > - which patches are already approved > > - which patches have issues identified in review > > - ...where no-one is yet working on addressing them > > - ...where someone is working on addressing them > > etc > > > > to make it clearer what the next action is for each patch, and who is > > meant to be taking it. > > > > (within Red Hat, we used to call this "who has the ball?") > > Yeah, our policy in https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html states that > "Pinging patches, Getting patches applied > > If you do not receive a response to a patch that you have submitted within > two weeks or so, it may be a good idea to chase it by sending a follow-up > e-mail to the same list(s). Patches can occasionally fall through the > cracks. Please be sure to include a brief summary of the patch and the URL > of the entry in the mailing list archive of the original submission." > > If some patches have been already reviewed, others partly, others in the > works and others need review, sending a mail with those details > so that it is easy to find out what is still pending is appreciated even > more. > > Jakub > -- Gcc-rust mailing list Gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-rust