Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your 
patch(es).  Please find some details below.  If you have any questions, please 
follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's 
#linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the 
usual project channel.

We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or 
reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within 
minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.

We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1270 , 
please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix.

In gcc_check master-aarch64 after:

  | commit gcc-15-1619-g3b9b8d6cfdf5
  | Author: Surya Kumari Jangala <jskum...@linux.ibm.com>
  | Date:   Tue Jun 25 08:37:49 2024 -0500
  | 
  |     ira: Scale save/restore costs of callee save registers with block 
frequency
  |     
  |     In assign_hard_reg(), when computing the costs of the hard registers, 
the
  |     cost of saving/restoring a callee-save hard register in prolog/epilog is
  |     taken into consideration. However, this cost is not scaled with the 
entry
  |     block frequency. Without scaling, the cost of saving/restoring is quite
  |     small and this can result in a callee-save register being chosen by
  | ... 14 lines of the commit log omitted.

FAIL: 4 regressions

regressions.sum:
                === g++ tests ===

Running g++:g++.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/general/cpy_1.c -march=armv8.2-a+sve 
-moverride=tune=none  check-function-bodies dup_x0_m
                === gcc tests ===

Running gcc:gcc.dg/dg.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr10474.c scan-rtl-dump pro_and_epilogue "Performing 
shrink-wrapping"

Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/sve/acle/aarch64-sve-acle.exp ...
... and 5 more entries

You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
 - 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/
The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make 
commands are in
 - 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts/notify/
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
 - 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail

The configuration of this build is:
CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64

-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment:

Current build   : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts
Reference build : 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2234/artifact/artifacts

Reproduce last good and first bad builds: 
https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/3b9b8d6cfdf59337f4b7ce10ce92a98044b2657b/tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64/reproduction_instructions.txt

Full commit : 
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/3b9b8d6cfdf59337f4b7ce10ce92a98044b2657b

List of configurations that regressed due to this commit :
* tcwg_gcc_check
** master-aarch64
*** FAIL: 4 regressions
*** 
https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/3b9b8d6cfdf59337f4b7ce10ce92a98044b2657b/tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64/details.txt
*** 
https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2235/artifact/artifacts

Reply via email to