On 20/12/2014 19:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
   There are also 2 tests that XPASS:
XPASS: experimental/string_view/element_access/char/2.cc execution test
XPASS: experimental/string_view/element_access/wchar_t/2.cc execution test

Debug assertions has been commented about because not compatible with constexpr. Do we keep them this way ?

Yes, otherwise they stop being constexpr.


I was more wondering if it fine to keep tests reporting a XPASS status cause they are displayed as the FAIL ones. But I think that XPASS is indeed a good status for a temporary issue.

Patch committed.

François

Reply via email to