[+cc Michael Eager] > Rather than having to lobby to keep it unchanged because we jumped the gun, > can we lobby to get the number assigned in the near future rather than in > the potentially far future? That feels more cooperative to me :-) > > Would that make Michael happier?
I'm pretty confident that Michael will say, "don't rely on the value until the final spec is published." (He's told me exactly that in the past. I've been guilty of jumping the gun on a couple of DW_LANG codes and a few DW_AT values.) But we should let Michael answer for himself... Michael, for your reference, here's the start of this thread: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg03195.html and its continuation into December: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00099.html Michael, are you OK with sharing your target dates for publishing the spec? -cary
