On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Segher Boessenkool
<seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:44:30PM -0800, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> The first three of these are from the previous series, with hopefully
>> all comments addressed.
>>
>> The fourth simplifies the code that breaks up an arith insn with a
>> compare to zero, using the helpers that the third patch introduced.
>>
>> The fifth and the sixth are separate from the rest and each other;
>> they fix PRs that people optimistically thought this patch series
>> would fix. Well, now they are right ;-)
>
> I completely forgot to explain how this was tested.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux, no regressions, with
> -m64,-m32,-m32/-mpowerpc64,-m64/-mlra. Also built cross-compilers
> and built the Linux kernel for all archs where that works (28 builds).
>
> Over the weekend, I bootstrapped on x86_64-linux, no configure flags
> at all. It regchecked fine after a few tries (one fortran testcase
> ping-pongs, actual_array_substr_2.f90). Also had to filter out all
> ASAN noise of course. And one of the gomp testcases runs for at
> least two hours ("./tpow_z", if that means something to anyone).
I saw tpow_z running for a long time also on AARCH64-linux-gnu.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
>
> Segher
