> Testing SANITIZE_ADDRESS bit in flag_sanitize_recover doesn't make sense,
> testing it in flag_sanitize of course does, but for recover you care
> whether
> the SANITIZE_{KERNEL,USER}_ADDRESS bit in flag_sanitize_recover is set
> depending on if SANITIZE_{KERNEL,USER}_ADDRESS is set in
> flag_sanitize_recover.
Ok, got it. BTW shouldn't we disable local optimization of ASan checks (in
asan.c) as well? That would be a massive perf hit ...
-Y
--
View this message in context:
http://gcc.1065356.n5.nabble.com/PATCH-Optimize-UBSAN-NULL-checks-add-sanopt-c-tp1085786p1095536.html
Sent from the gcc - patches mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
