On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Chen Gang wrote:
> + gcc_assert (wi::fits_to_tree_p(value, integer_type_node));
Watch formatting: space before '(' in the wi::fits_to_tree_p call.
Applies elsewhere in this patch as well.
When making such an interface change, (a) you should update the comment on
builtin_define_with_int_value to explain the new interface, and (b) you
should check existing callers to make sure their values are indeed in
range, and describe the check you did.
In fact, -fabi-version=0 results in __GXX_ABI_VERSION being defined to
999999 using builtin_define_with_int_value. That's out of range of int on
targets with 16-bit int. So that indicates against requiring the value to
be within range of int. It might however be OK to require the value to be
within range of target long.
> + if (value >= 0)
> + {
> + sprintf (buf, "%s="HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC"%s",
> + macro, value,
> + value <= HOST_INT_MAX
> + ? ""
> + : value <= HOST_LONG_MAX
> + ? "L" : "LL");
Limits on the host's int and long are completely irrelevant here. The
question is the target's int and long, not the host's - and consistency
indicates checking with wi::fits_to_tree_p (value, integer_type_node) if
the assertion checked with long_integer_type_node.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
