Hi!

Apparently, expand_expr with EXPR_WRITE can return
a SUBREG with SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P set on it.  For
UBSAN_CHECK_{ADD,SUB,MUL} expansion, I've been doing just
emit_move_insn into it, which apparently is wrong in that case,
store_expr instead uses convert_move for it.  The
{ADD,SUB,MUL}_OVERFLOW (i.e. __builtin_*_overflow) expansion
shouldn't need it, as the result is complex and complex integers
aren't promoted that way.  As store_expr* uses a tree expression
to store, while I have rtx, I just wrote a short helper function
for this.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2014-11-18  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR sanitizer/63520
        * internal-fn.c (expand_ubsan_result_store): New function.
        (expand_addsub_overflow, expand_neg_overflow, expand_mul_overflow):
        Use it instead of just emit_move_insn.

        * c-c++-common/ubsan/pr63520.c: New test.

--- gcc/internal-fn.c.jj        2014-11-12 13:28:47.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/internal-fn.c   2014-11-18 15:35:46.395916823 +0100
@@ -395,6 +395,21 @@ expand_arith_overflow_result_store (tree
   write_complex_part (target, lres, false);
 }
 
+/* Helper for expand_*_overflow.  Store RES into TARGET.  */
+
+static void
+expand_ubsan_result_store (rtx target, rtx res)
+{
+  if (GET_CODE (target) == SUBREG && SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P (target))
+    /* If this is a scalar in a register that is stored in a wider mode   
+       than the declared mode, compute the result into its declared mode
+       and then convert to the wider mode.  Our value is the computed
+       expression.  */
+    convert_move (SUBREG_REG (target), res, SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGN (target));
+  else
+    emit_move_insn (target, res);
+}
+
 /* Add sub/add overflow checking to the statement STMT.
    CODE says whether the operation is +, or -.  */
 
@@ -809,7 +824,7 @@ expand_addsub_overflow (location_t loc,
   if (lhs)
     {
       if (is_ubsan)
-       emit_move_insn (target, res);
+       expand_ubsan_result_store (target, res);
       else
        {
          if (do_xor)
@@ -904,7 +919,7 @@ expand_neg_overflow (location_t loc, tre
   if (lhs)
     {
       if (is_ubsan)
-       emit_move_insn (target, res);
+       expand_ubsan_result_store (target, res);
       else
        expand_arith_overflow_result_store (lhs, target, mode, res);
     }
@@ -1590,7 +1605,7 @@ expand_mul_overflow (location_t loc, tre
   if (lhs)
     {
       if (is_ubsan)
-       emit_move_insn (target, res);
+       expand_ubsan_result_store (target, res);
       else
        expand_arith_overflow_result_store (lhs, target, mode, res);
     }
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/pr63520.c.jj       2014-11-18 
15:40:07.271273710 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/ubsan/pr63520.c  2014-11-18 15:40:40.971673904 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* PR sanitizer/63520 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-fsanitize=undefined" } */
+
+int a;
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+  while (1)
+    {
+      if (a == 1)
+       break;
+      a -= 1;
+    }
+}


        Jakub

Reply via email to