Re: Query about the TREE_TYPE field

Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:49:51 -0800 

On 11/18/2014 02:32 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:

So it effectively does nothing.   Unless Jason can think of a good
reason for it, we probably ought to turf it.  Its effectively a NOP.


Yeah, go ahead.

Jason
























					Reply via email to