> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Fortune [mailto:matthew.fort...@imgtec.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 12:22 PM
> To: Rozycki, Maciej
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Moore, Catherine; Eric Christopher
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] MIPS/GCC: Unconditional jump generation bug fix
>
> Maciej W. Rozycki <ma...@codesourcery.com> writes:
> > On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> >
> > > > gcc/
> > > > * gcc/config/mips/mips.md (*jump_absolute): Use a branch when in
> > > > range, a jump otherwise.
> > >
> > > OK.
> > >
> > > I only got my head around this code last week otherwise I wouldn't
> > > have known whether this was correct!
> >
> > Committed now, thanks for your review. How about 4.9? -- once it is
> > unfrozen, that is.
>
> I admit to being a bit more nervous about 4.9 but the test coverage seems
> thorough enough. I guess I would have been less concerned if the
> optimisation was still just tied to TARGET_MICROMIPS for the 4.9 branch.
>
> Catherine, what do you think?
>
This is okay for 4.9 IMO.
