On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:57:57AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > ? There are also some comments about stdarg.h and stdio.h ordering,
> > dunno what it comes from and if it is still relevant when we require
> > C++ compiler.
>
> I think we should simply discourage people from using sstream for
> example.
That would be my preference too of course, unfortunately Bernd chose to use
it everywhere (grep '<<' nvptx.c').
> But I don't see how we can live without system.h with all the weird
> host systems still around - thus your solution above will very likely
> not work.
Well, I wasn't suggesting without system.h, I was suggesting to include
config.h first (that is required anyway), then C++ STL headers, then
system.h and then other GCC headers.
> Eventually we can split system.h into a c-system.h and cxx-system.h
> so we can distinguish between uses in files compiled with a C and
> a C++ compiler?
That wouldn't help here.
Jakub
