On 11/13/2014 11:10 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/13/2014 05:47 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
shall we do something like the below?
Something similar, yes. Though it would also be nice to avoid the
redundant checking in the two functions: we only want to do constexpr
folding if we did the tsubst.
Kai is working on folding changes, so I think let's let him weigh in on
how this will interact with his work.
Kai says this is fine with him. I think I'd like to rename the current
fold_non_dependent_expr* to instantiate_non_dependent_expr* and make
your new function fold_non_dependent_expr, since it's the one that's
doing full constant folding.
Jason
