On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/21/14 14:29, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> This tests for availability of return addresses in a number of tests.
>>
>>
>> Bernd
>>
>>
>> r422426.diff
>>
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/
>> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_return_address):
>> New function.
>> * gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c: Require return_address.
>> * gcc.c-torture/execute/20030323-1.c: Likewise.
>> * gcc.c-torture/execute/20030811-1.c: Likewise.
>> * gcc.c-torture/execute/eeprof-1.c: Likewise.
>> * gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c: Likewise.
>> * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr17377.c: Likewise.
>
> OK.
> jeff
>
I checked in this patch to revert the accidental checkin.
--
H.J.
----
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- ChangeLog (revision 217312)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2014-11-10 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com>
+
+ * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr35468.c: Revert the last change.
+
2014-11-10 Andreas Tobler <andre...@gcc.gnu.org>
* gcc.dg/fshort-wchar.c: Use arm_eabi instead of arm*-*-*eabi*.
Index: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr35468.c
===================================================================
--- gcc.c-torture/compile/pr35468.c (revision 217312)
+++ gcc.c-torture/compile/pr35468.c (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
/* PR tree-optimization/35468 */
-/* { dg-require-effective-target no_const_addr_space } */
void
foo (void)
