Is the current isl 0.12.2 in infrastructure entirely sufficient to replace cloog-isl. or should the ABI compatibility changes be made to graphite to allow gcc 5.0 to be transitioned to the isl 0.14 release? Especially if any graphite changes might be made before the gcc 5.0 release that could leverage new functionalities in isl 0.14. Jack
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Roman Gareev <gareevro...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > I've attached a patch which removes using of CLooG library from > Graphite. Is it fine for trunk? > > > -- > Cheers, Roman Gareev.