Hi Phil,
> The configure change is fine. Also the include. (From a libcc
> authorship point of view). I am not aware of the history of AF_UNIX
> over AF_LOCAL so I have no comment on that. Please await permission
the glibc manual states
AF_UNIX
This is a synonym for AF_LOCAL. Although AF_LOCAL is mandated by
POSIX.1g, AF_UNIX is portable to more systems. AF_UNIX was the
traditional name stemming from BSD, so even most POSIX systems
support it. It is also the name of choice in the Unix98
specification. (The same is true for PF_UNIX vs. PF_LOCAL).
(http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Address-Formats.html)
> from a GCC maintainer (I am not one).
You probably should become the libcc1 maintainer, though :-)
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University