On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:17:07AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote: > I'd like to ask Jakub for a review of the above two parts, other parts > are OK with a rename (as mentioned above).
Looks ok to me. Where the ICEs discovered just by normal make check or only
with GCC_TEST_RUN_EXPENSIVE ? If the latter, can you promote one of the
permutations that caused the ICEs to normal tests? If not and
GCC_TEST_RUN_EXPENSIVE has not been tested, can you try that?
Jakub
