On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:21:25PM +0400, Maxim Ostapenko wrote:
> 2014-10-28 Max Ostapenko <[email protected]>
>
> * asan.h (is_asan_intercepted): New function.
I'd call it asan_intercepted_p instead.
Can you please check if:
void foo (char *p)
{
volatile int zero = 0;
memcpy (p, "abc", zero);
p[0] = 'd';
}
does not remove instrumentation from p[0] store (i.e. the builtin store
length might (and this case actually is) zero, so no checking is done for
any byte.
Ditto for explicit s/zero)/0)/, and for s/zero)/2)/ check if the
instrumentation is removed.
If that works properly, the patch is ok with the routine name change. Thanks.
Jakub
