On 10/23/14 08:30, jb...@gmx.de wrote:
"Jeff Law" <l...@redhat.com>:
On 10/21/14 12:21, jb...@gmx.de wrote:
"Jeff Law" <l...@redhat.com>:
On 10/21/14 16:13, Haswell wrote:
The additional source must have the same requirement crossmodule-indircall-1.c
has.
* crossmodule-indircall-1a.c: Add missing requirement.
Why? When used by crossmodule-indircall-1.c we'll have already tested
the marker and when used by itself, it does nothing.
So I don't see why you think a marker is needed for this source file.
When configuring --disable-lto it gets compiled twice:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c compilation,
-fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c execution,
-fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c compilation,
-fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c execution,
-fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
I'd recommend looking deeper. I believe that file should be collapsing
down to main () { return 0; } when LTO is not enabled.
I'm not a dejagnu expert, but this is what happens:
/tmp/build/gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/build/gcc/
/tmp/gcc-4.9.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never
/tmp/gcc-4.9.1/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c
-fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE -lm -o
/tmp/build/gcc/testsuite/gcc/crossmodule-indircall-1a.x01
/tmp/cc4rrWCn.o: In function `main':
crossmodule-indircall-1a.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `main'
/tmp/ccgMlXGi.o:crossmodule-indircall-1a.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
compiler exited with status 1
Thanks.
What's weird here is the source file is listed twice on the command
line! No wonder it's failing.
I can't typically decipher tcl code without trace info and some
send_user commands to see what the values of various things are. But
the following seems, umm, odd:
profopt.exp:
set extra_flags [profopt-get-options $src]
[ ... ]
set options "$extra_options"
lappend options "additional_flags=$option $extra_flags
$profile_option"
set comp_output [${tool}_target_compile "$src" "$execname1"
executable $options]
Note $src passed to the target_compile procedure as an argument and also
inside the string $options.
I'd think that's the real problem here. Though I have no idea how
that's expected to work in an LTO enabled compile.
jeff
