On 10/22/2014 10:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
These tools currently require GNU extensions - something I probably ought to fix if we decide to add them to the gcc build itself.Would these be more appropriate in binutils?
I don't think so, given that we don't need any piece of regular binutils. There's no meaningful way to build libbfd. It would be strange to build binutils and have everything that's normally part of it disabled at configure time.
Bernd
