On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 11:58:37AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> In fact, I think I'll just go ahead and pre-approve the other patches of
> this nature.
Thanks. I have a bunch of similar patches that just need proper CL
entries, but they're of the same nature: missing declarations,
defaulting to int, gnu89 inline.
Even with these patches in, we'll still keep several dozens of test
that are using -std=gnu89, so we'll have some testing of functions
that don't have a return type specified/have missing forward
declarations/use gnu89 inline.
Marek
