Getting back to initial patch, is it ok? It fixes gcc.target/i386/pr52252-atom.c for AVX2 make check. X86 bootstrap is also ok.
2014-10-01 Evgeny Stupachenko <evstu...@gmail.com>
* config/i386/i386.c (expand_vec_perm_palignr): Extend to use AVX2
PALINGR instruction.
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_vec_perm_const_1): Add palignr try
for AVX2.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko <evstu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The test in pr62128 is exactly TEST 22 from
> gcc.dg/torture/vshuf-v32qi.c. It will check if the pattern is correct
> or not.
> Resubmitting patch looks good as current mail thread is already too
> complicated.
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 6:49 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko <evstu...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> It fix "gcc.target/i386/pr52252-atom.c" in core-avx2 make check and pr62128.
>>>
>>
>> I suggest you resubmit the patch as a bug fix for pr62128 with
>> testcases from pr62128 as well as gcc.target/i386/pr52252-atom.c.
>>
>>
>> --
>> H.J.
palignr_avx2.patch
Description: Binary data
