On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:54:57AM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote: > On 09/23/2014 11:33 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > >Your patch instead sorts based on the full test name, including options, > >which means that the output no longer matches what you'd get from a > >non-parallel run. AFAICT, it also no longer matches what you'd get from > >the .sh version. That might be OK, just thought I'd mention it.
With the parallellisation changes the output was pretty random order. My patch made that a fixed order again, albeit a different one from before. > Is this suppose to be resolved now? I'm still seeing some issues with a > branch cut from mainline from yesterday. This is from the following > sequence: > > check out revision 215511 , build, make -j16 check, make -j16 check, > then compare all the .sum files: I don't understand what exactly you did; you have left out some steps I think? Segher
