Ping?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 6:25 PM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix PR63266: Keep track of impact of sign extension in
> bswap
>
> Hi all,
>
> The fix for PR61306 disabled bswap when a sign extension is detected.
> However this led to a test case regression (and potential performance
> regression) in case where a sign extension happens but its effect is
> canceled by other bit manipulation. This patch aims to fix that by having a
> special marker to track bytes whose value is unpredictable due to sign
> extension. If the final result of a bit manipulation doesn't contain any
> such marker then the bswap optimization can proceed.
>
> *** gcc/ChangeLog ***
>
> 2014-09-15 Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>
>
> PR tree-optimization/63266
> * tree-ssa-math-opts.c (struct symbolic_number): Add comment
> about
> marker for unknown byte value.
> (MARKER_MASK): New macro.
> (MARKER_BYTE_UNKNOWN): New macro.
> (HEAD_MARKER): New macro.
> (do_shift_rotate): Mark bytes with unknown values due to sign
> extension when doing an arithmetic right shift. Replace
> hardcoded
> mask for marker by new MARKER_MASK macro.
> (find_bswap_or_nop_1): Likewise and adjust ORing of two
> symbolic
> numbers accordingly.
>
> *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog ***
>
> 2014-09-15 Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>
>
> PR tree-optimization/63266
> * gcc.dg/optimize-bswapsi-1.c (swap32_d): New bswap pass test.
>
>
> Testing:
>
> * Built an arm-none-eabi-gcc cross-compiler and used it to run the
> testsuite on QEMU emulating Cortex-M3 without any regression
> * Bootstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu target and testsuite was run
> without regression
>
>
> Ok for trunk?
