Hi,
I find that update_equiv_regs in ira.c sets the wrong EQUIV
reg-note for pseudo with more than one definiton in certain situation.
Here is a simplified RTL snippet after this function finishs handling:
(insn 77 37 78 2 (set (reg:SI 171)
(const_int 0 [0])) ticket151.c:33 52 {movsi_internal_dsp}
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_int 0 [0])
(nil)))
......
(insn 79 50 53 2 (set (mem/c:SI (reg/f:SI 136) [2 g_728+0 S4 A64])
(reg:SI 171)) ticket151.c:33 52 {movsi_internal_dsp}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 171)
(nil)))
(insn 53 79 54 2 (set (mem/c:SI (reg/f:SI 162) [4 g_163+0 S4 A32])
(reg:SI 163)) 52 {movsi_internal_dsp}
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 163)
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/f:SI 162)
(nil))))
(insn 54 53 14 2 (set (reg:SI 171)
(mem/u/c:SI (symbol_ref/u:SI ("*.LC8") [flags 0x2]) [4 S4
A32])) ticket151.c:49 52 {movsi_internal_dsp}
(expr_list:REG_EQUIV (mem/u/c:SI (symbol_ref/u:SI ("*.LC8")
[flags 0x2]) [4 S4 A32])
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (mem/u/c:SI (symbol_ref/u:SI ("*.LC8")
[flags 0x2]) [4 S4 A32])
(nil))))
The REG_EQUIV of insn 54 is not correct as pseudo 171 is defined
in insn 77 with a differerent value.
This may causes reload replacing pseudo 171 with mem/u/c:SI
(symbol_ref/u:SI ("*.LC8"), which is wrong.
A proposed patch for this issue, please comment:
Index: gcc/ira.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/ira.c (revision 215460)
+++ gcc/ira.c (working copy)
@@ -3477,18 +3477,26 @@ update_equiv_regs (void)
no_equiv (dest, set, NULL);
continue;
}
+
/* Record this insn as initializing this register. */
reg_equiv[regno].init_insns
= gen_rtx_INSN_LIST (VOIDmode, insn, reg_equiv[regno].init_insns);
/* If this register is known to be equal to a constant, record that
it is always equivalent to the constant. */
- if (DF_REG_DEF_COUNT (regno) == 1
- && note && ! rtx_varies_p (XEXP (note, 0), 0))
+ if (note && ! rtx_varies_p (XEXP (note, 0), 0))
{
- rtx note_value = XEXP (note, 0);
- remove_note (insn, note);
- set_unique_reg_note (insn, REG_EQUIV, note_value);
+ if (DF_REG_DEF_COUNT (regno) == 1)
+ {
+ rtx note_value = XEXP (note, 0);
+ remove_note (insn, note);
+ set_unique_reg_note (insn, REG_EQUIV, note_value);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ no_equiv (dest, set, NULL);
+ continue;
+ }
}
/* If this insn introduces a "constant" register, decrease the priority
Cheers,
Felix