On Fri, 2014-09-19 22:26:59 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbg...@lug-owl.de> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-09-18 16:55:35 -0500, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com> > wrote: > > I only see one RTEMS target that has been built in the top page. > > Are more than the powerpc-rtems being built? How can I check? > > The builders work down their list, and when done will start a new > round (with a list that would now contain the three new targets.) > Though they're still working down their "old" list; I've just added > the targets there as well, they should show up soonish on one of the > *-configlist_mk* builders.
Here we are:
arm-rtems was successfully built
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=355716
powerpc-rtems was successfully built
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=355861
nios2-rtems failed to build
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=355729
Please note that nios2 failed in the same way a number of other
targets fail, too:
cr16-elf
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=351532
fr30-elf
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=348510
lm32-elf
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=352224
microblaze-elf
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=347412
moxie-elf
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=355056
rl78-elf
http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/show_build_details.php?id=355368
The build error always looks like this (I should have opened a PR for
that already, but didn't):
[...]
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic
-Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Werror -fno-common
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../gcc/gcc -I../../../gcc/gcc/.
-I../../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include
-I/opt/cfarm/mpc/include -I../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I../../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber
-I../../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace -o reload1.o -MT reload1.o -MMD -MP -MF
./.deps/reload1.TPo ../../../gcc/gcc/reload1.c
../../../gcc/gcc/reload1.c: In function ‘void
elimination_costs_in_insn(rtx_insn*)’:
../../../gcc/gcc/reload1.c:3762:41: error: ‘orig_dup[0]’ may be used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
*recog_data.dup_loc[i] = orig_dup[i];
^
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [reload1.o] Error 1
(All config-list.mk builds are done with a compiler of the very same
revision number.)
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481
Signature of: http://perl.plover.com/Questions.html
the second :
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
