Hi Richard, >> It seems the new get_some_local_dynamic_name implementation in >> function.c lost the non-NULL check the sparc.c version had. I'm >> currently testing the following patch: > > Could you do a: > > call debug_rtx (...) > > on the insn that contains a null pointer? Normally insn patterns > shouldn't contain nulls, so I was wondering whether this was some > SPARC-specific construct.
proved a bit difficult to do: at the default -O2, insn was optimized away, at -g3 -O0, I only got can't compute CFA for this frame with gdb 7.8 even after recompiling all of the gcc dir with -g3 -O0. Here's what I find after inserting the call in the source: (insn 30 6 28 (sequence [ (call_insn:TI 8 6 7 (parallel [ (set (reg:SI 8 %o0) (call (mem:SI (unspec:SI [ (symbol_ref:SI ("__tls_get_addr")) ] UNSPEC_TLSLDM) [0 S4 A32]) (const_int 1 [0x1]))) (clobber (reg:SI 15 %o7)) ]) /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libgo/runtime/proc.c:936 390 {tldm_call32} (expr_list:REG_EH_REGION (const_int -2147483648 [0xffffffff80000000]) (nil)) (expr_list (use (reg:SI 8 %o0)) (nil))) (insn 7 8 28 (set (reg:SI 8 %o0) (plus:SI (reg:SI 23 %l7) (unspec:SI [ (reg:SI 8 %o0 [112]) ] UNSPEC_TLSLDM))) 388 {tldm_add32} (nil)) ]) /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libgo/runtime/proc.c:936 -1 (nil)) Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University