On 08/21/2014 11:36 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Aug 21, 2014, at 8:00 AM, Sandra Loosemore
<san...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
tests that assume some non-default branch costs in the back end
Thanks.
One comment, could you put in /* non default branch cost */ above the
three where that is true.
The three what? :-S
Even better would be to refactor those
into something for target supports. Though, really the best course
of action would be for someone to list the targets where the non
default condition holds true, and make those pay the price, not the
universal complement.
I definitely agree about this. Perhaps the tree-ssa maintainers can
take care of this, or at least clarify what target(s) this is intended
to work on rather than having to experimentally determine which ones
don't implement these optimizations, or propose some way to test for the
support rather than having to list targets explicitly.
-Sandra
