> A while ago I've removed a couple of those 'typedef struct' things, as > they are not required in C++ anymore. Is there any particular reason > why this couldn't be simply 'struct int_n_data_t' ?
No particular reason.
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 -> __intN conversio... Oleg Endo
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 -> __intN conv... DJ Delorie
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 -> __intN conv... Joseph S. Myers
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 -> __intN ... DJ Delorie
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 -> __i... Joseph S. Myers
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 ->... DJ Delorie
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 ... Joseph S. Myers
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 ->... DJ Delorie
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int128 ... Joseph S. Myers
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main __int... DJ Delorie
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main _... Joseph S. Myers
- Re: __intN patch 3/5: main _... DJ Delorie
