On 8/12/14 7:38, Mike Stump wrote: > On Aug 11, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Chen Gang <gang.chen.5...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Welcome additional disccusions or completions, and if no any additional >> reply within 1 week, I shall send patch v2 for it (still use sprintf). > > So, my take is it is easier for a maintainer to re-review if you do it > without additional delay. I’d recommend addressing the review points and > posting without waiting a week in this case. Waiting is useful if a review > point is contentious. >
OK, thanks. What you said sounds reasonable to me. But excuse me, I have no enough time resource on it, and also, I am still not quite familiar with building and checking (especially it needs a long time to build and check which has negative effect for analyzing). So, excuse me again, I have to need more time period on it. But I should try send patch v2 for it within this week (2014-08-17). And still welcome additional ideas, suggestions or completions. Thanks. -- Chen Gang Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed
