Hi Mike,
>> Or do we go with the removal suggestion of Mike?
>
> I’ll let others weigh in. I’m fine either way. Original author likely
> prefers the xfail, so I’m fine with the above.
the test now XPASSes on Solaris, adding testsuite noise in the other
direction on completely innocent systems. Given that we're not actually
testing gcc behaviour or a workaround for a glibc bug here, but just
alerting users to changed cproj semantics on old and newer glibc systems
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg01285.html
I'd strongly suggest just removing the test and the supporting
effective-target keywords.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
