On 31/07/14 11:53, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 5 July 2014 16:12, Charles Baylis <charles.bay...@linaro.org> wrote:
On 3 July 2014 15:26, Richard Earnshaw <rearn...@arm.com> wrote:
So OK, but if you're considering back-ports, I suggest you let it bake a
while on trunk first.
Committed as r212303.
It was a few weeks ago now, so is it OK to backport this to 4.8 and
4.9 branches?
Given that we've had this bake sufficiently on trunk and have seen no
regressions reported it should be fine to go back to these branches.
Further we've had the 4.9.1 and 4.8.3 releases recently so I'd say Yes,
unless the RM's object in the next 24 hours.
regards
Ramana
