> Jan Hubicka <hubi...@ucw.cz> writes: > > > * cgraph.h (symtab_node): Add nonzero_address. > > (decl_in_symtab_p): Break out from ... > > (symtab_get_node): ... here. > > * fold-const.c: Include cgraph.h > > (tree_single_nonzero_warnv_p): Use symtab to determine > > if symbol is non-zero. > > * symtab.c (symtab_node::nonzero_address): New method. > > > > * gcc.dg/pr36901.h: Simplify because non-zero symbol folding no > > longer happens during parsing. > > * gcc.dg/pr44024.c: Update template. > > * g++.dg/tree-ssa/nonzero-2.C: New testcase. > > * g++.dg/tree-ssa/nonzero-1.C: New testcase. > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/nonzero-1.c: New testcase. > > FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert9.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors) > Excess errors: > /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20140714/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert9.C:5:1: > error: non-constant condition for static assertion > /daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20140714/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert9.C:5:1: > error: '(f != 0u)' is not a constant expression
Ah, sorry, missed this one. I think the error is correct (based on earlier discussion we can not really expect addresses of symbols to be non-NULL), so I would just update the testcase? Honza > > Andreas. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de > GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 > "And now for something completely different."
