Hi,
On 07/11/2014 07:58 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Oops, this patch didn't thread with the earlier one...
Yeah, sorry, I considered my drafts of yesterday evening a distraction
and wanted to start a fresh thread with a complete (more meaningful) new
proposal. Probably not a good idea, after all, confusing...
On 07/11/2014 06:15 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
if (SCALAR_TYPE_P (type))
Is the condition still necessary?
I'm removing it and retesting. In any case (the eventual)
check_narrowing will return immediately if !ARITHMETIC_TYPE_P (type) is
true... Would the amended patch be Ok?
Thanks!
Paolo.
