On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 04:52:39PM +1000, Kugan wrote:

Ok with following nit:

> +/* Checks if RTX of SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P() is promoted for given SIGN.  */
> +#define SUBREG_CHECK_PROMOTED_SIGN(RTX, SIGN)        \
> +((SIGN) == SRP_POINTER ? SUBREG_PROMOTED_GET (RTX) == SRP_POINTER    \
> + : (SIGN) == SRP_SIGNED ? SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGNED_P (RTX)             \
> + : SUBREG_PROMOTED_UNSIGNED_P (RTX))
>  
>  /* True if the subreg was generated by LRA for reload insns.  Such
>     subregs are valid only during LRA.  */
>  #define LRA_SUBREG_P(RTX)    \
>    (RTL_FLAG_CHECK1 ("LRA_SUBREG_P", (RTX), SUBREG)->jump)
>  
> +/* Returns sign of promoted mode for SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P().  */
> +#define SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGN(RTX)    \
> +  ((RTL_FLAG_CHECK1 ("SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGN", (RTX), SUBREG)->volatil) ? 1\
> +   : (RTX)->unchanging - 1)
> +
>  /* Access various components of an ASM_OPERANDS rtx.  */

Can you please move SUBREG_PROMOTED_SIGN definition right below
SUBREG_CHECK_PROMOTED_SIGN, so all the SUBREG promotion macros are next to
each other?

        Jakub

Reply via email to