On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 09:25:50PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
> > This patch is fine but c++ allows class and struct be used
> > interchangeable. If there is a compilers which does not it is broken
> > and should be report to them. Yes that means clang is broken.
>
> Clang does allow for it (it actually is the stage 1 compiler on
> FreeBSD 10, the platform I used for my tests); it just warns about
> it. About 400 times.
That doesn't change anything that the warning is very much broken.
In C++ struct is simply a class with default public:, class with a default
private:, when you are just forward declaring it, whether it defaults to
public: or private: doesn't matter at all, therefore the warning just
enforces some weirdo clang coding style.
Jakub
