2014-06-29 20:47 GMT+02:00 Tim Shen <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]> wrote: >> Alternatively, we could just make them local statics instead of member >> data and still remove the duplciation (see attached). > > This is a good idea. Can we use constexpr for the functions/static variables?
Not so for local statics within constexpr functions, but you could have constexpr static data members, yes. - Daniel
