> From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme > > However > although the original comments on struct symbolic_number implies that > there is a mapping between host bytes (the bytes of the symbolic number) > and target bytes, it isn't the case since do_shift_rotate () shift the > symbolic > number by quantity of BYTES_PER_UNIT instead of CHAR_BIT.
My bad, the comment can be understood both ways. Best regards, Thomas
