On 19 June 2014 14:12, James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> wrote:
> This has been sitting waiting for comment for a while now. If we do need a > mechanism to describe individual costs for alternatives, it will need > applied to all the existing uses in aarch64.md/aarch64-simd.md. I think > solving that problem (if we need to) is a seperate patch, and shouldn't > prevent this one from going in. Agreed. OK /Marcus
