On 12 June 2014 04:31, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: > On Jun 10, 2014, at 3:03 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana....@googlemail.com> > wrote: >> I am a bit ambivalent between getting folks to add scan-assembler >> tests here and worrying between this and getting the behaviour >> correct. Additionally if you add the complexity of scanning for >> aarch64 as well this starts getting messy. >> >> At this point I'm going to wait to see if any of the testsuite >> maintainers step in and comment and if not I'll start looking at this >> properly early next week. > > [ ducks ] So, I wasn’t going to comment… If you guys do something really > stupid, I’ll scream, as hopefully will others. Doing something a little > misguided I don’t think hurts much. The worst case if you figure out in a > year or two why it was a bad idea and then fix it, not the end of the world.
If the execution part is OK and the scan-assembler is questionable, I can just remove that part (or leave it commented until we decide otherwise).
