On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Commits 210964 and 210965 for this patch have broken GCC build on arm* > targets. > For instance on target arm-none-linux-gnueabi, when creating > unwind-arm.o, I can see: > /tmp/5673443_3.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/lra.c:1362 > 0x8e3bcd process_insn_for_elimination > > /tmp/5673443_3.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/lra-eliminations.c:1344 > 0x8e3bcd lra_eliminate(bool, bool) > > /tmp/5673443_3.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/lra-eliminations.c:1408 > 0x8dd753 lra_constraints(bool) > > /tmp/5673443_3.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/lra-constraints.c:4049 > 0x8cdc1a lra(_IO_FILE*) > /tmp/5673443_3.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/lra.c:2332 > 0x8911f8 do_reload > /tmp/5673443_3.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/ira.c:5444 > 0x891508 execute > /tmp/5673443_3.tmpdir/aci-gcc-fsf/sources/gcc-fsf/trunk/gcc/ira.c:5605 > Please submit a full bug report, > >
Can you file a proper bug report with a pre-processed file - information about configury options etc. to show what the issue is. Ramana > > > On 23 May 2014 20:19, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 05/20/14 15:36, Richard Sandiford wrote: >>>> >>>> This is OK for the trunk (referring to the follow-up message which fixed >>>> EWRONGPATCH. >>> >>> >>> Sorry, while working on the follow-up LRA patch, I realised I hadn't >>> accounted for target changes that happen directly via target_reinit >>> (rather than SWITCHABLE_TARGETS) and cases where reinit_regs is called >>> to change just the register information. Both could potentially affect >>> the enabled attribute. >>> >>> This version adds a recog_init function that clears the data if necessary. >>> There are no other changes from first time. Is this still OK? >> >> Thanks for letting me know, that's a minor twiddle -- the patch is still OK. >> >> Jeff
