On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Eric Botcazou <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Please keep the "redundant" test, it speeds up comparison on hash
>> collisions. As you are on it I'd use size_int (lr).
>
> The redundant test is very redundant, see the line just below it.
Oh... ok ;)
>> I think it's ok to CSE foo (0) for
>>
>> try {
>> foo (0);
>> } catch (...) { side-effect }
>> foo (0);
>>
>> but not
>>
>> foo(0);
>> try {
>> foo (0);
>> } catch (...) { side-effect }
>>
>> but I don't see a clever way to preserve one but not the other
>> (at least in SCCVN). Do you think it's worth trying to preserve
>> that?
>
> I doubt it, I think this would happen very rarely in practice. The problem in
> Ada doesn't come from real-life code but from an artificial ACATS test.
>
>> Otherwise the patch looks good to me. (bonus point for a C++
>> testcase as Ada is not in our testing requirements and it would
>> be nice to exercise this w/o Ada)
>
> OK, I can add a C++ testcase.
Thanks,
Richard.
> --
> Eric Botcazou
