On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 05/08/14 02:17, Ilya Enkovich wrote: >>> >>> >>> Right. Richi explicitly wanted the entire set approved before staging in >>> any of the bits. >> >> >> I thought it would be useful to have approved codes in the trunk to >> reveal some possible problems on earlier stages. It also requires >> significant effort to keep everything in consistency with the trunk >> (especially when big refactoring happens) and having some parts >> committed would be helpful. Will keep it in a branch for now but let >> me know if you change your mind :) > > I understand -- my preference would to be go go ahead with the stuff that's > already been approved, mostly for the reasons noted above. But with Richi > wanting to see it go in as a whole after complete review I think it's best > to wait. While we could argue back and forth with Richi, it's not a good > use of time. >
Shouldn't there a git or svn branch for MPX, including run-time library, so that people can take a look at the complete MPX change and try MPX today as NOP? The only extra requirement is MPX enabled binutils. -- H.J.
