Hi,
some time ago I worked a bit on this very old diagnostic enhancement issue:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg01588.html
and yesterday we got a duplicate. Adding an inform to
convert_for_assignment still makes sense to me, thus I resurrected the
patch, tightened a bit the check and retested it. What do you think?
Should we maybe cover more cases, which?, in the inform?
Thanks,
Paolo.
////////////////////////
/cp
2014-05-08 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
PR c++/13981
* typeck.c (convert_for_assignment): Provide an inform for pointers
to incomplete class types.
/testsuite
2014-05-08 Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com>
PR c++/13981
* g++.dg/diagnostic/pr13981.C: New.
Index: cp/typeck.c
===================================================================
--- cp/typeck.c (revision 210205)
+++ cp/typeck.c (working copy)
@@ -8094,6 +8094,13 @@ convert_for_assignment (tree type, tree rhs,
default:
gcc_unreachable();
}
+ if (TYPE_PTR_P (rhstype)
+ && TYPE_PTR_P (type)
+ && CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (rhstype))
+ && CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (type))
+ && !COMPLETE_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (rhstype)))
+ inform (input_location, "class type %qT is incomplete",
+ TREE_TYPE (rhstype));
}
return error_mark_node;
}
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/pr13981.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/pr13981.C (revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/diagnostic/pr13981.C (working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// PR c++/13981
+
+struct A {};
+struct B;
+
+void func( A *a );
+
+int main()
+{
+ B *b = 0;
+ func(b); // { dg-error "cannot convert" }
+} // { dg-message "is incomplete" "is incomplete" { target *-*-* } 11 }