On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 10:24:31PM +0200, Oleg Endo wrote: > Hi, > > I've committed the attached patch as r210040, which reinstates the RTL > pass. > > Trevor, could you please double check that you haven't missed any other > cases in your pass refactoring patches?
I have no clue how this happened, I remember changing it... :(
Anyway I did another round of greping and just finished looking over a
set of config-list.mk results, and didn't find anything.
thanks and sorry~
Trev
>
> Cheers,
> Oleg
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> * config/sh/sh_optimize_sett_clrt.cc (sh_optimize_sett_clrt::execute):
> Add missing function* argument.
> Index: gcc/config/sh/sh_optimize_sett_clrt.cc
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/config/sh/sh_optimize_sett_clrt.cc (revision 210027)
> +++ gcc/config/sh/sh_optimize_sett_clrt.cc (working copy)
> @@ -79,8 +79,8 @@
> public:
> sh_optimize_sett_clrt (gcc::context* ctx, const char* name);
> virtual ~sh_optimize_sett_clrt (void);
> - virtual bool gate (function *);
> - virtual unsigned int execute (void);
> + virtual bool gate (function*);
> + virtual unsigned int execute (function* fun);
>
> private:
> static const pass_data default_pass_data;
> @@ -161,13 +161,13 @@
> }
>
> bool
> -sh_optimize_sett_clrt::gate (function *)
> +sh_optimize_sett_clrt::gate (function*)
> {
> return optimize > 0;
> }
>
> unsigned int
> -sh_optimize_sett_clrt::execute (void)
> +sh_optimize_sett_clrt::execute (function* fun)
> {
> unsigned int ccr0 = INVALID_REGNUM;
> unsigned int ccr1 = INVALID_REGNUM;
> @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
> // Look for insns that set the ccreg to a constant value and see if it can
> // be optimized.
> basic_block bb;
> - FOR_EACH_BB_REVERSE_FN (bb, cfun)
> + FOR_EACH_BB_REVERSE_FN (bb, fun)
> for (rtx next_i, i = NEXT_INSN (BB_HEAD (bb));
> i != NULL_RTX && i != BB_END (bb); i = next_i)
> {
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
