On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, David Malcolm wrote: > Successfully generates HTML, info and pdf via appropriate make > invocations; example of resulting HTML can be seen at the bottom of: > > http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/2014-04-25/Tuple-representation.html > > The diagram is split over pages 178-180 of the generated PDF: > > http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/gcc/2014-04-25/gccint.pdf
When I just checked that PDF did not (yet?) have that table. > but I don't think there's a good way to avoid page breaks there. Agreed. > Bootstrap in progress [do pure doc fixes require a bootstrap?] Not generally, no. > OK for trunk, assuming bootstraps? (and eventually for the 4.9 branch, > after a few days?) Yes and yes. (I did not review the technical accuracy of the diagram in detail, but (a) micromanagement is not helpful and (b) the current documentation is plain wrong.) The one thing that confused me a bit at first was the line +- gimple_statement_base where I then thought all the others should move their indentation left by four or so columns. Which is not what you are trying to state in fact. How about omitting the "+-" from that one? Gerald
