Rohit says this more narrow patch for PR 60735 fixes the problem and does not appear to have any other side effects. I have done bootstrap builds on powerpc Linux with no regressions. Is it ok to apply to the 4.8, 4.9 branches and trunk?
[gcc] 2014-04-17 Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> PR target/60735 * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (mov<mode>_softfloat32, FMOVE64 case): If mode is DDmode and TARGET_E500_DOUBLE allow move. * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_debug_reg_global): Print some more debug information for E500 if -mdebug=reg. [gcc/testsuite] 2014-04-17 Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> PR target/60735 * gcc.target/powerpc/pr60735.c: New test. Insure _Decimal64 does not cause errors if -mspe. -- Michael Meissner, IBM IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460-6245, USA email: meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797
Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md =================================================================== --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md (revision 209445) +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md (working copy) @@ -9395,7 +9395,8 @@ (define_insn "*mov<mode>_softfloat32" (match_operand:FMOVE64 1 "input_operand" "r,Y,r,G,H,F"))] "! TARGET_POWERPC64 && ((TARGET_FPRS && TARGET_SINGLE_FLOAT) - || TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT || TARGET_E500_SINGLE) + || TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT || TARGET_E500_SINGLE + || (<MODE>mode == DDmode && TARGET_E500_DOUBLE)) && (gpc_reg_operand (operands[0], <MODE>mode) || gpc_reg_operand (operands[1], <MODE>mode))" "#" Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c =================================================================== --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (revision 209445) +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (working copy) @@ -2283,6 +2283,24 @@ rs6000_debug_reg_global (void) if (rs6000_float_gprs) fprintf (stderr, DEBUG_FMT_S, "float_gprs", "true"); + fprintf (stderr, DEBUG_FMT_S, "fprs", + (TARGET_FPRS ? "true" : "false")); + + fprintf (stderr, DEBUG_FMT_S, "single_float", + (TARGET_SINGLE_FLOAT ? "true" : "false")); + + fprintf (stderr, DEBUG_FMT_S, "double_float", + (TARGET_DOUBLE_FLOAT ? "true" : "false")); + + fprintf (stderr, DEBUG_FMT_S, "soft_float", + (TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT ? "true" : "false")); + + fprintf (stderr, DEBUG_FMT_S, "e500_single", + (TARGET_E500_SINGLE ? "true" : "false")); + + fprintf (stderr, DEBUG_FMT_S, "e500_double", + (TARGET_E500_DOUBLE ? "true" : "false")); + if (TARGET_LINK_STACK) fprintf (stderr, DEBUG_FMT_S, "link_stack", "true"); Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr60735.c =================================================================== --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr60735.c (revision 0) +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr60735.c (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-mcpu=8540 -mspe -mabi=spe -mfloat-gprs=single -O2" } */ +/* { dg-skip-if "not an SPE target" { ! powerpc_spe_nocache } { "*" } { "" } } */ + +/* In PR60735, the type _Decimal64 generated an insn not found message. */ + +void +pr60735 (_Decimal64 *p, _Decimal64 *q) +{ + *p = *q; +}