On 2014.04.06 at 09:13 +0100, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > On 04/04/14 18:33, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > > > I'm testing a patch that makes the test in the loop: > > > > if (TREE_PUBLIC (base_binfo) > > Hm, binfo's aren't noted that way, it's encoded in BINFO_ACCESS and > SET_BINFO_ACCESS in search.c. We'd need to move those back to cp.h or expose > an > interface in search.c. This is looking like a rat hole ...
Thus a revert looks like the best option at this point. -- Markus
