Le 02/04/2014 22:29, Paul Richard Thomas a écrit : > Dear All, > > This fix, of itself, is quite obvious. The offset was being set to > zero for array segments, rather than that required for unity valued > lvalues. > > I think that the fix could be used to clean up: > > trans-expr.c(gfc_trans_alloc_subarray_assign) > trans-expr.c(gfc_trans_pointer_assign) > trans-expr.c(fncall_realloc_result) > trans-array.c(trans_associate_var) > > each of which contains calculation of the offset. However, I do not > think that this is the stage to fix things that are not broken! > > I propose to keep the PR open as a reminder to look into this. > > Bootstrapped and regtested on X86_64/FC17 - OK for trunk and backporting to > 4.8? >
Hello Paul, this looks good; OK. Thanks. Mikael
