On Mar 31, 2014, at 4:50 AM, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: > -$(INSTALL_PROGRAM) xgcc$(exeext) > $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$(GCC_INSTALL_NAME)$(exeext) > ! -rm -f > $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$(target_noncanonical)-gcc-$(version)$(exeext) > ! -( cd $(DESTDIR)$(bindir) && \ > ! $(LN) $(GCC_INSTALL_NAME)$(exeext) > $(target_noncanonical)-gcc-$(version)$(exeext) ) > ! -if [ ! -f gcc-cross$(exeext) ] ; then \ > rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$(target_noncanonical)-gcc-tmp$(exeext); \ > ( cd $(DESTDIR)$(bindir) && \ > $(LN) $(GCC_INSTALL_NAME)$(exeext) > $(target_noncanonical)-gcc-tmp$(exeext) && \ > --- 3205,3217 ---- > install-driver: installdirs xgcc$(exeext) > -rm -f $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$(GCC_INSTALL_NAME)$(exeext) > -$(INSTALL_PROGRAM) xgcc$(exeext) > $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$(GCC_INSTALL_NAME)$(exeext) > ! -if [ "$(GCC_INSTALL_NAME)" != "$(target_noncanonical)-gcc-$(version)" > ]; then \ > ! -rm -f > $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/$(target_noncanonical)-gcc-$(version)$(exeext) \ > ! -( cd $(DESTDIR)$(bindir) && \ > ! $(LN) $(GCC_INSTALL_NAME)$(exeext) > $(target_noncanonical)-gcc-$(version)$(exeext) ) \ > ! fi
Certainly safer for release like this, but, gotta wonder if we can avoid the ignoring of errors with the added check… I’d have to work out why they did that in the first place and run a build and play a bit to be as sure as I’d like to be… but, a cross and a native build I think should test it adequately.
